PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES, AND FIRST PRINCIPLES: WHERE DO BARNETT AND BERNICK LEAD US?→

DIGNITY, DISCRIMINATION, AND GENDER IDENTITY→

303 CREATIVE LLC V. ELENIS AND HUMAN DIGNITY→

STRICT SCRUTINY AS THE APPROPRIATE STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR PARENTAL RIGHTS CASES: A HISTORICAL ARGUMENT→

OF THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS: PARENTAL AUTHORITY AND THE COMMON LAW→

IS THE RIGHT OF PARENTS TO DIRECT THEIR CHILDREN’S EDUCATION “DEEPLY ROOTED” IN OUR “HISTORY AND TRADITION”?→

SWEEPING AND FORCING THE PRESIDENT INTO SECTION 3→

A VIEW INSIDE THE TEXAS SENATE: THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR.→

A DEFENSE OF THE UNBORN PERSON→

OF CROWNS AND COMMON LAW→

TITLE VII’S RELIGIOUS LIBERTY RULES IN CARTER→

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS TO THE 25TH ANNUAL BANQUET OF THE TEXAS REVIEW OF LAW & POLITICS→

DISRUPTION, DISCRIMINATION, AND DIVERSITY IN LEGAL EDUCATION→

DIGNITY AND RESPECT: FREE SPEECH AND COMPUSLORY PRONOUNS IN THE ARMED FORCES→

A CLASSICAL LEGAL INTERPRETATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT→

“EVERY SAFEGUARD KNOWN TO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW”: THE HISTORY AND TRADITION OF ECONOMIC LIBERTY IN TEXAS→

THE TWO SEXES ARE NOT FUNGIBLE: THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE AGAINST TRANSGENDER-INCLUSIVE SPORTS→

"THE PEOPLE AND THEIR ELECTED LAWMAKERS": AN UPDATE ON DEMOCRACY AND FEDERALISM IN POST-DOBBS AMERICA→

CORPORATE CAPTAINS OF THE WOKE REVOLUTION: THE NEED TO LIMIT CORPORATE POLITICAL ACTIVISM→

WOKE CORPORATIONS: COWARDICE AND CRUSADERS FOR THE WORST→